For information only. Not investment advice, a recommendation, an offer or a solicitation, and without regard to any recipient’s objectives or circumstances. Figures come from third-party sources believed reliable but not guaranteed, and market data may be delayed. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() NVIDIA CorporationNVDA US · Information Technology · USD Current price$227.21as of Sep 21, 2026 Summary
Analyst consensusStrong Buy 10Buy 48Hold 2Sell 159 analysts 3-year price (USD)Factor profileMulti-factor score 92 / 100 Market data
Business descriptionNVIDIA is the dominant designer of GPUs and full-stack AI infrastructure, having evolved from a GPU-centric gaming and workstation supplier into a comprehensive AI compute ecosystem spanning silicon, high-speed networking, systems, and software. Since Q1 FY2027, the company reports two segments: Data Center (92.5% of FQ2 FY27 revenue of $96.2B), split between Hyperscale cloud providers and AI Clouds/Industrial/Enterprise (ACIE) customers — the latter now the faster-growing half at +138% Y/Y — and increasingly driven by networking (InfiniBand, Spectrum-X Ethernet switches, NVLink interconnect — $14.8B in Q1 FY27 alone, +199% Y/Y) as much as by raw GPU compute; and Edge Computing (~7.5% of revenue), which consolidates the former Gaming (GeForce RTX), Professional Visualization (Omniverse), Automotive (DRIVE), and OEM & Other lines. Edge Computing is increasingly framed around AI PCs (RTX Spark) and Physical AI — autonomous vehicles (Alpamayo model portfolio), robotics (Isaac GR00T), and industrial digital twins (Omniverse/Cosmos) — a nascent (~3% of sales) but strategically important growth vector. The CUDA software stack — training/inference libraries, developer tools, and now agentic-AI orchestration frameworks — remains the primary source of switching costs and developer lock-in across both segments. Competitive moatDefensibility rests on four reinforcing layers, not on the GPU alone. Software estate. CUDA and the libraries above it hold two decades of developer investment. The switching cost is not the chip but re-porting and re-validating a customer's whole training and serving pipeline — which is why cheaper accelerators keep failing to convert benchmark wins into displacement. Rack-scale integration. Rivals sell components; NVIDIA sells the data center as the unit of compute — GPU, Vera CPU, NVLink and InfiniBand/Spectrum-X networking together. Networking alone was $14.8B in Q1 FY27 (+199% Y/Y). Roadmap cadence. Blackwell → Blackwell Ultra → Vera Rubin → Rubin Ultra → Feynman on an annual rhythm keeps competitors aiming at a moving target, and shifts the contest toward co-packaged optics and rack engineering, where NVIDIA's scale compounds. Supply pre-emption. $279B of committed capacity locks scarce HBM and advanced packaging away from rivals. In a shortage, the balance sheet is itself a moat. ⚠️ Thinnest point: custom hyperscaler ASICs (Broadcom Inc. XPUs, Google TPU, Meta MTIA) attack the highest-volume internal workloads, where the CUDA advantage matters least. Recent developments
Investment risks / red flags
Financials
Classification
|
Theme Exposure
Related Peers
Factor Profile (Spider Chart)
TBI ModelPrice Chart (TradingView)
Symbol: NVDABusiness description
NVIDIA is the dominant designer of GPUs and full-stack AI infrastructure, having evolved from a GPU-centric gaming and workstation supplier into a comprehensive AI compute ecosystem spanning silicon, high-speed networking, systems, and software. Since Q1 FY2027, the company reports two segments: Data Center (92.5% of FQ2 FY27 revenue of $96.2B), split between Hyperscale cloud providers and AI Clouds/Industrial/Enterprise (ACIE) customers — the latter now the faster-growing half at +138% Y/Y — and increasingly driven by networking (InfiniBand, Spectrum-X Ethernet switches, NVLink interconnect — $14.8B in Q1 FY27 alone, +199% Y/Y) as much as by raw GPU compute; and Edge Computing (~7.5% of revenue), which consolidates the former Gaming (GeForce RTX), Professional Visualization (Omniverse), Automotive (DRIVE), and OEM & Other lines. Edge Computing is increasingly framed around AI PCs (RTX Spark) and Physical AI — autonomous vehicles (Alpamayo model portfolio), robotics (Isaac GR00T), and industrial digital twins (Omniverse/Cosmos) — a nascent (~3% of sales) but strategically important growth vector. The CUDA software stack — training/inference libraries, developer tools, and now agentic-AI orchestration frameworks — remains the primary source of switching costs and developer lock-in across both segments.
Competitive moat
Defensibility rests on four reinforcing layers, not on the GPU alone.
Software estate. CUDA and the libraries above it hold two decades of developer investment. The switching cost is not the chip but re-porting and re-validating a customer's whole training and serving pipeline — which is why cheaper accelerators keep failing to convert benchmark wins into displacement.
Rack-scale integration. Rivals sell components; NVIDIA sells the data center as the unit of compute — GPU, Vera CPU, NVLink and InfiniBand/Spectrum-X networking together. Networking alone was $14.8B in Q1 FY27 (+199% Y/Y).
Roadmap cadence. Blackwell → Blackwell Ultra → Vera Rubin → Rubin Ultra → Feynman on an annual rhythm keeps competitors aiming at a moving target, and shifts the contest toward co-packaged optics and rack engineering, where NVIDIA's scale compounds.
Supply pre-emption. $279B of committed capacity locks scarce HBM and advanced packaging away from rivals. In a shortage, the balance sheet is itself a moat.
⚠️ Thinnest point: custom hyperscaler ASICs (Broadcom Inc. XPUs, Google TPU, Meta MTIA) attack the highest-volume internal workloads, where the CUDA advantage matters least.
Recent developments
- CFRA revisions (08/27/2026): Strong Buy and the $270 target held (~15x CY28 EPS, mapping to FY2029); FY27/28/29 EPS lifted to $9.23/$15.69/$17.76 from $9.00/$12.95/$16.29 on Vera Rubin content of ~$42B per gigawatt vs ~$25B for Grace Blackwell. ⚠️ Consensus target is $323.32 — CFRA sits ~17% below on methodology, not thesis.
- Analyst actions (August 2026): Raymond James to $352 (08/25/2026), BMO initiated Outperform / $340 (08/21/2026), Keybanc $330 (08/24/2026), Goldman Buy / $285 (08/11/2026). Coverage 79 Buy / 2 Hold / 1 Sell.
- FQ2 FY2027 results (08/26/2026): Revenue beat consensus by $3.84B (+4.2%), the largest absolute dollar beat in company history, alongside a first FY2028 indication — ~70% growth vs ~45% consensus, explicitly supply-constrained, with demand implying ~100%. Figures in Key financials. Fourth consecutive quarter of a negative next-day reaction to a beat.
- Financing perimeter widens (10-Q, 08/26/2026): The $500B+ platforms signed 08/10/2026 with Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs and KKR — GPUs as recoverable collateral, off balance sheet — now joined by guarantees to SB Energy covering ~4.25 GW of IT load. The guarantee is the step change: facilitator becomes contingent obligor.
- China out of the model (10-Q, 08/26/2026): Hopper shipments were <1% of FQ2 Data Center revenue and FQ3 China H200 revenue is guided to zero after a further $0.4B write-down. January's case-by-case licensing cleared ~$10B of licences, but Beijing discouraged deliveries and the volumes never came.
- Vera Rubin pricing and SpaceX (08/24/2026): NVL72 rack at ~$3.5M–$4.0M, a 25% premium to Blackwell, with first revenue in the Oct-Q. Musk confirmed an exclusive SpaceX GPU commitment.
- Vera CPU ramp (07/21/2026): ~$20B of 2026 bookings against a $200B agentic and physical-AI TAM; early adopters include Anthropic, OpenAI, Oracle and SpaceX.
- Kyber delay risk (SemiAnalysis, 07/06/2026): Rubin Ultra's NVL144 reportedly slipped 12+ months to 2028 on its 78-layer PCB midplane. NVIDIA denies it; architectural execution risk stays elevated.
- Vera Rubin in full production (05/31/2026): Oct-Q shipments to AWS, Microsoft, Google, OpenAI, Meta and xAI, with claimed 35x inference throughput and 10x lower cost-per-token vs Blackwell.
- RTX Spark AI PC (05/31/2026): Windows-on-Arm platform with Microsoft, powering 30+ laptops and 10 desktops from ASUS, Dell, HP, Lenovo and Microsoft this autumn.
- Capital return reset (05/20/2026): New $80B buyback (~$118.5B remaining) and a 25x dividend increase to $0.25/share quarterly, against a ~50% FCF return commitment.
- Feynman roadmap (03/16/2026): Feynman GPU (2028) and Rosa CPU announced, committing to co-packaged optics and all-optical NVLink scaling to NVL1152.
- Groq acquisition (Dec 2025): $20B for inference-optimised LPU technology and team, now marketed inside Vera Rubin.
Investment risks / red flags
- Supply is the constraint, and it sits upstream ⚠️: ~70% FY2028 growth is capped by memory against demand implying ~100%, making revenue a function of HBM allocation from SK Hynix Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Micron Technology, Inc.. The $279B of commitments is mitigation and exposure at once.
- Margin compression is guided, not speculative ⚠️: 75.0% to a 71%–72% FQ4 trough, recovering to only 72%–73% in FY2028 — and that assumes price increases stick. If customers resist, the trough is the new level.
- Circular funding ⚠️: A growing share of demand is enabled by capital NVIDIA arranges or backstops. Off balance sheet today, but a guarantee is a contingent claim, and vendor-underwritten demand is lower quality than demand funded from customer cash flow. CFRA's standing concern.
- Concentration and thin CY28+ visibility: Five hyperscalers plus a few AI labs still dominate Data Center revenue; ACIE (+138% Y/Y) is broadening the base. Whether capex normalises after this cycle is unresolved.
- Execution on the architectural shift: Bottlenecks now run through advanced packaging and co-packaged optics as much as HBM — the reported Kyber delay is the live illustration, and TSMC CoWoS stays tight.
- Positioning, not multiple, is the valuation risk: ~26.5x trailing GAAP against ~70% forward growth is not demanding, but four straight negative next-day reactions to beats say the bar is set by positioning.
- Geopolitical tail: China is out of the numbers in both directions, so the residual risk is a new control regime — on Rubin-class parts, on allied jurisdictions, or on the sovereign deals now in the growth mix.
Market Data
Source: mkts.io · Sep 21, 2026, 18:00 UTC
Key Metrics
Analyst Consensus
Calendar Events
Financials
Forward Estimates
| Period | EPS Est | Rev Est |
|---|---|---|
| 0q | 2.47 | $109.01B |
| +1q | 2.74 | $124.37B |
| 0y | 9.31 | $411.56B |
| +1y | 15.68 | $682.73B |
Earnings
Rating Changes
| Date | Firm | Action | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | Piper Sandler | init | Overweight |
| Sep 4, 2026 | Rosenblatt | main | Buy |
| Sep 4, 2026 | Needham | reit | Buy |
| Aug 27, 2026 | Citigroup | main | Buy |
| Aug 27, 2026 | Mizuho | main | Outperform |
| Aug 27, 2026 | JP Morgan | main | Overweight |
